Bristol Cars logoBristol Cars logo

News

Bristol Cars’ liquidator emphasises its position in row over intellectual property rights

  • Claims by investor and property developer are rejected
  • Earlier action over different trade name revealed to have failed
  • ‘Incredibly premature’ action is called into question

Time 11:31 am, May 20, 2021

The joint liquidator of Bristol Cars has upped the ante in the row over intellectual property rights.

Investor and property developer Jason Wharton, who owns Bristol Manufacturing Ltd, claimed to have bought the rights (IPR) as he sought to revive the brand, which went into liquidation in February 2020.

He says it will include reborn versions of the firm’s 411 Series 8 and Fighter, which are set to be the ‘final internal combustion engine Bristol Cars’.


Production will then move to creating a new battery-electric vehicle – the Buccaneer – scheduled to start in 2025

However, Frost Group responded to say he didn’t have the IPR and that what Wharton had actually done was try to revoke some trademarks, not remove them, and had bought some tooling and spares at an auction of the company’s assets.

Wharton then claimed that Frost Group wasn’t the joint liquidator – even though there is firm evidence at Companies House that it is – and said it hadn’t given any ‘status or qualitative information about IPR ownership, so it has no useful purpose’.


He also stated that what Frost Group had said was  ‘verging on the misleading, possibly indeed irresponsible’.

Trademarks are an area that come under the umbrella of intellectual property rights, and in a statement issued to Car Dealer, Frost Group said it objected to Wharton’s claims that its earlier rebuttal was in any way inaccurate or misleading.

It reaffirmed that it was the liquidator, with two of the group’s insolvency practitioners – Jeremy Frost and Patrick Wadsted – joint liquidators of Bristol Cars Ltd (BCL).

Jason Wharton

Jason Wharton

Frost Group also pointed out that both BCL and Kamkorp Autokraft Ltd, which owns the trademarks in question, had objected to Wharton’s actions over the Bristol trademarks.

‘Mr Wharton has sought to ‘‘revoke’’ not ‘‘remove’’ the trademark registrations, which Kamkorp Autokraft Ltd owned.’

It added: ‘To clarify, if a trademark has not been in use for a period of five years, a person or organisation can apply to register the trademark for their purposes.

‘Therefore, it is essential to highlight that BCL went into liquidation in February 2020, so this action is incredibly premature.’

Frost Group also highlighted the fact that Wharton embarked on a similar action over the trade name Allard and failed.

‘Our agents Wyles Hardy have spoken with Mr Wharton several times about matters surrounding the IPR of Bristol Cars.


‘They and we being fully aware of the IPR which BCL owns, which includes, amongst other things, the vehicle designs, we have advised Mr Wharton to speak to our agents if he wished to purchase these.

‘Unfortunately, however, whilst at first engaging with them with a view to acquiring such IPR, he has not pursued that course of action.

‘In terms of these vehicle designs, we can categorically state that neither Mr Wharton nor any of his companies own any of these. They remain the property of BCL.

‘We would therefore seriously question how he plans to start “remastering” any Bristol 411 or Fighter.’

Row over Bristol Cars intellectual property rights intensifies as counterclaims continue

Bristol Cars row erupts as joint liquidator says intellectual property rights haven’t been bought

Bristol Cars reborn with electric dreams but first recreations will use V8 power

John Bowman's avatar

John has been with Car Dealer since 2013 after spending 25 years in the newspaper industry as a reporter then a sub-editor/assistant chief sub-editor on regional and national titles. John is chief sub-editor in the editorial department, working on Car Dealer, as well as handling social media.



More stories...

Advert
Server 108